All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=719602

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg8tfdrwkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg8p6L8woM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgip7I-woM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg8vPNqAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgirqzpQoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

win-zenbook

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980142506175887184

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : board_temperature/video.html?src_tulip2.wav_type_audio

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468618      45.9524 +- 4.68534      21      good
chromium@468811      45.619 +- 3.38414       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.wav.type.audio media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980142506175887184

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5497745126719488


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980111062853051184

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author xiyuan@chromium.org ===

Hi xiyuan@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the
results.


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : xiyuan
  Commit : 494548aec6a17848303f5502e2eddcc7f0f0b10b
  Date   : Tue May 02 13:39:46 2017
  Subject: cros: Skip need-dircrypto-migration check if not needed

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : board_temperature/video.html?src_tulip2.wav_type_audio
  Change       : 4.77% | 52.8571428571 -> 50.3333333333

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468618      52.8571 +- 6.34147      14      good
chromium@468619      50.1667 +- 3.08221      9       bad       <--
chromium@468620      50.3571 +- 7.69508      14      bad
chromium@468622      50.2778 +- 3.24893      9       bad
chromium@468625      50.0556 +- 4.14997      9       bad
chromium@468631      50.0 +- 2.34521         6       bad
chromium@468643      50.5 +- 2.0             6       bad
chromium@468667      49.8333 +- 2.70801      6       bad
chromium@468715      50.0833 +- 1.9257       6       bad
chromium@468811      50.3333 +- 3.24037      9       bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.wav.type.audio media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980111062853051184

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5497745126719488


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

The CL is chromeos only and should not have impact on win.