Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.2% regression in smoothness.top_25_smooth at 468580:468618 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 8 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980150136352024080
,
May 8 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980150127260151072
,
May 8 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.top_25_smooth Metric : frame_times/Wordpress Revision Result N chromium@468579 16.6365 +- 0.179624 21 good chromium@468618 16.6316 +- 0.189829 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Wordpress smoothness.top_25_smooth Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980150127260151072 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5603732168900608 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 8 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.top_25_smooth Metric : frame_times/Wordpress Revision Result N chromium@468579 16.6461 +- 0.0989022 21 good chromium@468618 16.6345 +- 0.156962 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Wordpress smoothness.top_25_smooth Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980150136352024080 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5817570134851584 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 8 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980145028708701504
,
May 8 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980145023523575472
,
May 8 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.top_25_smooth Metric : frame_times/Wordpress Revision Result N chromium@468579 16.6303 +- 0.137293 21 good chromium@468618 16.6354 +- 0.144919 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Wordpress smoothness.top_25_smooth Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980145028708701504 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5603732168900608 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 8 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.top_25_smooth Metric : frame_times/Wordpress Revision Result N chromium@468579 16.6292 +- 0.202885 21 good chromium@468618 16.6428 +- 0.14463 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Wordpress smoothness.top_25_smooth Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980145023523575472 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5817570134851584 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org
, May 8 2017