New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 719542 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
█ kraynov@google.com
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

9.5% regression in memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2 at 469309:469353

Project Member Reported by kraynov@chromium.org, May 8 2017 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org, May 8 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=719542

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgipL47ggM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac12
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 8 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:private_dirty_size_max/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:private_dirty_size_max

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@469308      462120883 +- 40790981      21      good
chromium@469353      462716862 +- 49365436      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980150301807603232

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5291953110908928


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 8 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:private_dirty_size_max/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:private_dirty_size_max

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@469308      462365782 +- 50300476      21      good
chromium@469353      459665011 +- 42726060      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980150293709918656

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6343901465542656


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:private_dirty_size_max/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:private_dirty_size_max

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@469308      468962573 +- 53725991      21      good
chromium@469353      473712709 +- 47334938      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980133697119689616

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6343901465542656


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:private_dirty_size_max/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:private_dirty_size_max

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@469308      461007023 +- 31670952      21      good
chromium@469353      461988037 +- 44189635      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980133711025010512

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5291953110908928


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 10 by benhenry@chromium.org, Jul 27 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.
►

Sign in to add a comment