New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 719536 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

4.8% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 468723:468785

Project Member Reported by kraynov@chromium.org, May 8 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=719536

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg8tmXygkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-webview-nexus5X

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_search/load_search_yahoo

Revision             Result                 N
chromium@468722      5145015 +- 165169      21      good
chromium@468785      5147648 +- 142421      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.yahoo system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980150697405718720

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6460517478039552


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_search/load_search_yahoo

Revision             Result                 N
chromium@468722      5136140 +- 150203      21      good
chromium@468785      5143942 +- 185219      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.yahoo system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980150657177424688

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6166682122321920


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 10 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_search/load_search_yahoo

Revision             Result                 N
chromium@468722      5149794 +- 163134      21      good
chromium@468785      5167689 +- 184738      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.yahoo system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980137482346348768

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6460517478039552


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 10 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_search/load_search_yahoo

Revision             Result                 N
chromium@468722      5129850 +- 145209      21      good
chromium@468785      5143991 +- 138634      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.yahoo system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980133700244970768

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6166682122321920


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. 

Sign in to add a comment