New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 719534 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 719359
Owner: ----
Closed: May 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

74.9% regression in v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2 at 469624:469670

Project Member Reported by kraynov@chromium.org, May 8 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=719534

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgirGy7gkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
Mergedinto: 719359
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : hpayer
  Commit : 8833af23e9788c725b0887446915e4820383a385
  Date   : Fri May 05 11:24:02 2017
  Subject: [heap] Memory reducer calls GC with kGCCallbackFlagCollectAllExternalMemory flag.

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2
  Metric       : v8-gc-total_max/tumblr
  Change       : 88.22% | 3.19144444444 -> 5.18911111111

Revision                           Result                  N
chromium@469623                    3.19144 +- 2.7776       9      good
chromium@469647                    3.02589 +- 2.78582      9      good
chromium@469653                    3.07022 +- 2.42667      9      good
chromium@469654                    3.21883 +- 2.09719      6      good
chromium@469654,v8@25959abf79      2.95933 +- 3.01533      9      good
chromium@469654,v8@b7b3781b87      2.86056 +- 2.57503      9      good
chromium@469654,v8@8833af23e9      5.59689 +- 2.56463      9      bad       <--
chromium@469655                    5.57017 +- 1.68968      6      bad
chromium@469656                    6.78083 +- 2.60924      6      bad
chromium@469659                    5.38789 +- 1.93197      9      bad
chromium@469670                    5.18911 +- 1.81863      9      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=tumblr v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980150876151294992

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4997219972808704


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : hpayer
  Commit : 8833af23e9788c725b0887446915e4820383a385
  Date   : Fri May 05 11:24:02 2017
  Subject: [heap] Memory reducer calls GC with kGCCallbackFlagCollectAllExternalMemory flag.

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2
  Metric       : v8-gc-total_max/tumblr
  Change       : 126.69% | 2.90216666667 -> 6.57883333333

Revision                           Result                   N
chromium@469623                    2.90217 +- 0.647471      6       good
chromium@469647                    3.35556 +- 3.12749       9       good
chromium@469653                    3.52211 +- 2.71056       9       good
chromium@469654                    3.64144 +- 3.7606        9       good
chromium@469654,v8@25959abf79      3.356 +- 2.83882         6       good
chromium@469654,v8@b7b3781b87      3.41617 +- 2.82713       6       good
chromium@469654,v8@8833af23e9      5.8245 +- 3.23824        14      bad       <--
chromium@469655                    6.44933 +- 1.53141       9       bad
chromium@469656                    5.96883 +- 1.1978        6       bad
chromium@469659                    5.839 +- 2.09676         6       bad
chromium@469670                    6.57883 +- 3.32803       6       bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=tumblr v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980150889576660640

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5233083604795392


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment