Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4.6% regression in memory.top_10_mobile_stress at 469474:469588 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 8 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980152046799988864
,
May 8 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980152036737251632
,
May 8 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author juliatuttle@chromium.org === Hi juliatuttle@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : juliatuttle Commit : aeb1abc9b5177c2817b21fe3a366fc0f23450607 Date : Thu May 04 21:14:38 2017 Subject: Reporting: Plumb from //chrome/browser/browsing_data. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile_stress Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/http_www_baidu_com_s_word_google Change : 6.25% | 144725944.0 -> 153769400.0 Revision Result N chromium@469473 144725944 +- 869007 6 good chromium@469474 153572621 +- 4187927 6 bad <-- chromium@469475 150883085 +- 6616101 6 bad chromium@469477 154036835 +- 2693959 6 bad chromium@469481 155253347 +- 3229524 6 bad chromium@469488 152959587 +- 9258956 6 bad chromium@469502 157141944 +- 871577 6 bad chromium@469531 151281592 +- 7258987 6 bad chromium@469588 153769400 +- 2002696 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980152046799988864 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4565190286245888 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 9 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author cbiesinger@chromium.org === Hi cbiesinger@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : cbiesinger Commit : 047294d8a76953fb5d19b9fc20e7980f2641bc45 Date : Thu May 04 21:16:10 2017 Subject: [css-flexbox] Merge align-content and justify-content handling Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile_stress Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/http_www_baidu_com_s_word_google Change : 5.96% | 145382498.667 -> 154054072.0 Revision Result N chromium@469473 145382499 +- 1850017 6 good chromium@469474 148205155 +- 5207218 6 good chromium@469475 153402637 +- 2637674 6 bad <-- chromium@469477 152931939 +- 6601345 6 bad chromium@469481 152046520 +- 12445556 6 bad chromium@469488 156753165 +- 1364018 6 bad chromium@469502 157105592 +- 1228022 6 bad chromium@469531 154607203 +- 5509328 6 bad chromium@469588 154054072 +- 2102473 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980152036737251632 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5301950721032192 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 10 2017
Extremely unlikely to be my change
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org
, May 8 2017