New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 719499 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
█ kraynov@google.com
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

32.2% regression in page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif at 469086:469263

Project Member Reported by kraynov@chromium.org, May 8 2017 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org, May 8 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=719499

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgion2pwoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

win-zenbook
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 8 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___booking.com

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@469085      1087.48 +- 141.333      21      good
chromium@469263      1082.0 +- 44.7721       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...booking.com page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980154183859193600

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5048142313029632


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 8 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___booking.com

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@469085      1088.02 +- 173.967      21      good
chromium@469263      1084.31 +- 90.3872      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...booking.com page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980154193358480128

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5005957412683776


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 8 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___booking.com

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@469085      1088.02 +- 173.967      21      good
chromium@469263      1084.31 +- 90.3872      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...booking.com page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980145035247483360

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5005957412683776


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___booking.com

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@469085      1084.65 +- 144.975      21      good
chromium@469263      1081.5 +- 171.316       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...booking.com page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980145032930668464

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5048142313029632


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 10 by benhenry@chromium.org, Jul 27 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.
►

Sign in to add a comment