Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
53.5% regression in blink_perf.paint at 469248:469301 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 8 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980157368572359456
,
May 9 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author jasonkliu@chromium.org === Hi jasonkliu@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : jasonkliu Commit : 813e697704faf15bfbc14d8381d8f06eda85c86a Date : Thu May 04 07:51:51 2017 Subject: Enable waterfall testing for DesktopIOSPromotion. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.paint Metric : large-table-repaint/large-table-repaint Change : 1.03% | 185.776285714 -> 183.866 Revision Result N chromium@469247 185.776 +- 7.85864 14 good chromium@469274 185.745 +- 9.75404 14 good chromium@469291 186.864 +- 7.55286 14 good chromium@469292 185.0 +- 8.34565 21 bad <-- chromium@469294 184.273 +- 6.31676 14 bad chromium@469296 181.822 +- 4.04563 6 bad chromium@469301 183.866 +- 7.18317 14 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.paint Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980157368572359456 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5335617224835072 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 9 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org
, May 8 2017