Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
70.8% regression in blink_perf.paint at 469086:469263 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 8 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980157406744048336
,
May 8 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980157398072190544
,
May 8 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.paint Metric : paint/paint To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.paint Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980157406744048336 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5207289641828352 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 8 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.paint Metric : paint/paint Revision Result N chromium@469085 84.4521 +- 23.6133 21 good chromium@469263 84.0712 +- 28.6997 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.paint Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980157398072190544 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5304634404503552 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 8 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980133713034907504
,
May 8 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980133709167925552
,
May 9 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.paint Metric : paint/paint Revision Result N chromium@469085 76.4593 +- 4.67412 21 good chromium@469263 76.359 +- 4.02777 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.paint Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980133713034907504 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5207289641828352 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 9 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.paint Metric : paint/paint Revision Result N chromium@469085 76.6044 +- 6.19194 21 good chromium@469263 76.7706 +- 5.82209 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.paint Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980133709167925552 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5304634404503552 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org
, May 8 2017