New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 719358 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

101.5% regression in v8.browsing_mobile at 468610:468890

Project Member Reported by ulan@google.com, May 8 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by ulan@google.com, May 8 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=719358

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgisryoQoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5X

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_avg/browse_chrome/browse_chrome_newtab

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468609      8.10276 +- 6.82758      16      good
chromium@468890      8.50628 +- 5.65059      19      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.chrome.newtab v8.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980177459584514000

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6621039062155264


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_avg/browse_chrome/browse_chrome_newtab

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468609      8.10276 +- 6.82758      16      good
chromium@468890      8.50628 +- 5.65059      19      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.chrome.newtab v8.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980167677391536848

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6621039062155264


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 6 by u...@chromium.org, May 12 2017

Labels: Performance-Sheriff-V8
Project Member

Comment 7 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 17 2017

Labels: Hotlist-Google

Comment 8 by u...@chromium.org, Jul 24 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Bisect bot cannot reproduce the regression.

Sign in to add a comment