New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 718909 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
█ kraynov@google.com
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

8.3% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he at 468418:468544

Project Member Reported by kraynov@chromium.org, May 5 2017 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org, May 5 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=718909

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg8rWXpQsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

win-high-dpi
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 5 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed for unknown reasons

Please contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.startimes.com_f.aspx


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.startimes.com.f.aspx page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980421682674664128

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5541004389646336


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 5 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.startimes.com_f.aspx

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468417      645.021 +- 68.8708      21      good
chromium@468544      636.673 +- 70.3398      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.startimes.com.f.aspx page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980421675926974000

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4958606824308736


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 5 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.startimes.com_f.aspx

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468417      638.886 +- 146.261      21      good
chromium@468544      654.501 +- 197.052      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.startimes.com.f.aspx page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980413051170001280

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5541004389646336


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 5 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.startimes.com_f.aspx

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468417      637.397 +- 72.9404      21      good
chromium@468544      650.958 +- 148.569      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.startimes.com.f.aspx page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980409279054795280

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4958606824308736


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 10 by benhenry@chromium.org, Jul 27 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.
►

Sign in to add a comment