Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
13.1% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 469167:469266 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980424992355835024
,
May 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980424982849466000
,
May 5 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_games/load_games_lazors Revision Result N chromium@469166 64100645 +- 19776376 21 good chromium@469266 63718546 +- 20504975 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.games.lazors system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980424992355835024 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5816906109419520 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980397945990472784
,
May 5 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_games/load_games_lazors Revision Result N chromium@469166 63714645 +- 20403025 21 good chromium@469266 63819191 +- 20219040 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.games.lazors system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980424982849466000 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5343359121489920 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980394179442456400
,
May 6 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_games/load_games_lazors Revision Result N chromium@469166 63370581 +- 21127920 21 good chromium@469266 63721667 +- 20372869 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.games.lazors system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980397945990472784 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5816906109419520 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 6 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_games/load_games_lazors Revision Result N chromium@469166 64614010 +- 18981778 21 good chromium@469266 65967055 +- 14991255 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.games.lazors system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980394179442456400 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5343359121489920 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org
, May 5 2017