Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
7.2% regression in page_cycler_v2.typical_25 at 468620:468712 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980425097173286768
,
May 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980425085699644448
,
May 5 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : scottmg Commit : 6b0131a01da5149cd7acb81973f881a0d85fbe59 Date : Tue May 02 16:34:31 2017 Subject: network service: Plumbing to get URLLoaderFactory to renderer on nav commit Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.typical_25 Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.fifa.com_ Change : 7.00% | 153.396888889 -> 164.135833333 Revision Result N chromium@468619 153.397 +- 13.8758 9 good chromium@468666 154.82 +- 8.3169 6 good chromium@468672 155.421 +- 6.74205 9 good chromium@468674 155.986 +- 9.73593 9 good chromium@468675 164.054 +- 15.7994 9 bad <-- chromium@468678 163.648 +- 1.68332 6 bad chromium@468689 288.994 +- 681.716 6 bad chromium@468712 164.136 +- 7.57734 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2.typical_25 Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980425097173286768 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5856625966972928 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 5 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : scottmg Commit : 6b0131a01da5149cd7acb81973f881a0d85fbe59 Date : Tue May 02 16:34:31 2017 Subject: network service: Plumbing to get URLLoaderFactory to renderer on nav commit Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.typical_25 Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.fifa.com_ Change : 6.38% | 154.961666666 -> 164.849499999 Revision Result N chromium@468619 154.962 +- 7.13078 6 good chromium@468666 155.367 +- 4.15416 6 good chromium@468672 156.158 +- 7.84573 9 good chromium@468674 158.151 +- 15.0958 14 good chromium@468675 164.659 +- 9.0633 9 bad <-- chromium@468678 165.403 +- 4.50928 6 bad chromium@468689 165.73 +- 7.55424 6 bad chromium@468712 164.849 +- 3.37289 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2.typical_25 Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980425085699644448 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6464397125353472 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org
, May 5 2017