Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
7.1% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he at 468545:468596 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980425285556821136
,
May 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980425257789435392
,
May 5 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.masrawy.com_ Revision Result N chromium@468544 1472.93 +- 144.111 21 good chromium@468596 1481.18 +- 77.5588 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.masrawy.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980425285556821136 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5266653740269568 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 5 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.masrawy.com_ Revision Result N chromium@468544 2574.88 +- 82.3431 21 good chromium@468596 2580.66 +- 221.631 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.masrawy.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980425257789435392 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5854326062317568 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980413053949993168
,
May 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980413047496934544
,
May 5 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.masrawy.com_ Revision Result N chromium@468544 1472.93 +- 144.111 21 good chromium@468596 1481.18 +- 77.5588 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.masrawy.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980413053949993168 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5266653740269568 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 5 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.masrawy.com_ Revision Result N chromium@468544 2593.26 +- 123.67 21 good chromium@468596 2592.36 +- 181.686 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.masrawy.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980413047496934544 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5854326062317568 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org
, May 5 2017