New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 718829 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
█ kraynov@google.com
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

45.5% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 468626:468735

Project Member Reported by kraynov@chromium.org, May 5 2017 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org, May 5 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=718829

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg8qPM7wkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5X
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 6 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.bindings
  Metric       : node-type/node-type

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468625      102.543 +- 27.9636      6      good
chromium@468735      111.048 +- 84.3202      8      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980435110050471488

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6372485362089984


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 6 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.bindings
  Metric       : node-type/node-type

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468625      115.1 +- 66.9773        12      good
chromium@468735      120.319 +- 34.4866      10      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980435096965471968

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5254260024934400


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 7 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.bindings
  Metric       : node-type/node-type

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468625      102.543 +- 27.9636      6      good
chromium@468735      111.048 +- 84.3202      8      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980360204924033584

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6372485362089984


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 7 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.bindings
  Metric       : node-type/node-type

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468625      98.8022 +- 74.053       10      good
chromium@468735      113.794 +- 16.8335      2       bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980352657374302752

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5254260024934400


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 10 by benhenry@chromium.org, Jul 27 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.
►

Sign in to add a comment