Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
12.1% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 468954:469009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980439951587225856
,
May 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980439938278516080
,
May 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980439899045475856
,
May 5 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author dgozman@chromium.org === Hi dgozman@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : dgozman Commit : 4bf230386429b68cd02e0b1cb8450691f525fc04 Date : Fri Apr 28 08:01:32 2017 Subject: [DevTools] Cleanup overlay resources in Dispose Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/http_search_yahoo_com_search__ylt_p_google Change : 10.55% | 73733461.3333 -> 65957205.3333 Revision Result N chromium@467921 73733461 +- 150236 6 good chromium@467926 73855659 +- 698903 6 good chromium@467927 65955840 +- 92817.6 6 bad <-- chromium@467928 65922389 +- 80404.1 6 bad chromium@467930 65923755 +- 80404.1 6 bad chromium@467938 65933312 +- 74632.7 6 bad chromium@467954 65957205 +- 3739.12 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980439899045475856 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5813413009162240 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 5 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : kbr Commit : 1d44ab0e3d0a7cd05ce1da956bb87a85a8b88174 Date : Wed May 03 16:54:08 2017 Subject: Fix bug in virtualized GL context state management upon creation. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/http_search_yahoo_com_search__ylt_p_google Change : 11.85% | 66087594.6667 -> 73919829.3333 Revision Result N chromium@468953 66087595 +- 580207 6 good chromium@468981 65978368 +- 74632.7 6 good chromium@468995 66056192 +- 699109 6 good chromium@469002 65957205 +- 3739.12 6 good chromium@469006 66068480 +- 684461 6 good chromium@469007 73930069 +- 56952.6 6 bad <-- chromium@469008 74030421 +- 685133 6 bad chromium@469009 73919829 +- 92757.3 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980439938278516080 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4982508854181888 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 5 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : kbr Commit : 1d44ab0e3d0a7cd05ce1da956bb87a85a8b88174 Date : Wed May 03 16:54:08 2017 Subject: Fix bug in virtualized GL context state management upon creation. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/http_search_yahoo_com_search__ylt_p_google Change : 10.78% | 65942414.2222 -> 73048974.2222 Revision Result N chromium@468953 65942414 +- 355233 9 good chromium@468981 66045269 +- 687884 9 good chromium@468995 66134471 +- 900644 9 good chromium@469002 66238236 +- 1027975 9 good chromium@469006 65933995 +- 72214.4 6 good chromium@469007 73930752 +- 110781 6 bad <-- chromium@469008 73908224 +- 58502.6 6 bad chromium@469009 73048974 +- 7526560 9 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980439951587225856 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5294320577413120 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org
, May 5 2017