Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
52.2% regression in blink_perf.canvas at 468764:468848 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980440174372470384
,
May 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980440168437923936
,
May 5 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : zakerinasab Commit : 4c4a925b1a047a296b7962566ff63918f3eba1c4 Date : Tue May 02 20:34:28 2017 Subject: Add performance test for ImageData.dataUnion Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.canvas Metric : putImageData/putImageData Change : 58.88% | 1097.22431144 -> 451.158113342 Revision Result N chromium@468763 1097.22 +- 158.426 6 good chromium@468764 432.743 +- 35.4251 6 bad <-- chromium@468765 438.978 +- 52.3738 6 bad chromium@468766 430.712 +- 46.2837 6 bad chromium@468769 439.807 +- 47.9019 6 bad chromium@468774 448.924 +- 60.1069 6 bad chromium@468785 450.217 +- 37.9162 6 bad chromium@468806 451.126 +- 52.4232 6 bad chromium@468848 451.158 +- 109.571 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.canvas Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980440168437923936 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4932070419202048 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 5 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : zakerinasab Commit : 4c4a925b1a047a296b7962566ff63918f3eba1c4 Date : Tue May 02 20:34:28 2017 Subject: Add performance test for ImageData.dataUnion Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.canvas Metric : putImageData/putImageData Change : 62.39% | 1083.80662988 -> 407.641646603 Revision Result N chromium@468763 1083.81 +- 94.4319 6 good chromium@468764 447.872 +- 15.4158 6 bad <-- chromium@468765 435.082 +- 54.2909 6 bad chromium@468766 442.228 +- 21.1841 6 bad chromium@468769 435.69 +- 15.3478 6 bad chromium@468774 440.324 +- 85.0467 6 bad chromium@468785 441.089 +- 108.315 6 bad chromium@468806 463.771 +- 19.8307 6 bad chromium@468848 407.642 +- 153.717 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.canvas Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980440174372470384 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5323247987458048 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org
, May 5 2017