All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=718755

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg8oL2vwoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980445888947874992

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980445876312875280

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_hi_ru
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___rutracker.org_forum_index.php

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468564      104.885 +- 9.96187      21      good
chromium@468595      104.058 +- 11.1109      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...rutracker.org.forum.index.php page_cycler_v2.intl_hi_ru

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980445888947874992

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5249217733328896


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980439476288464304

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_hi_ru
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___rutracker.org_forum_index.php

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468564      126.144 +- 38.1272      21      good
chromium@468595      126.631 +- 25.6836      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...rutracker.org.forum.index.php page_cycler_v2.intl_hi_ru

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980445876312875280

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5843435367432192


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980435704649870160

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_hi_ru
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___rutracker.org_forum_index.php

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468564      105.491 +- 22.9229      21      good
chromium@468595      104.479 +- 10.3822      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...rutracker.org.forum.index.php page_cycler_v2.intl_hi_ru

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980439476288464304

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5249217733328896


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_hi_ru
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___rutracker.org_forum_index.php

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468564      104.725 +- 25.4511      21      good
chromium@468595      104.606 +- 13.9978      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...rutracker.org.forum.index.php page_cycler_v2.intl_hi_ru

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980435704649870160

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5843435367432192


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.