Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop failing on 7 builders |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionv8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop failing on 7 builders https://luci-logdog.appspot.com/v/?s=chrome%2Fbb%2Fchromium.perf%2FLinux_Perf%2F627%2F%2B%2Frecipes%2Fsteps%2Fv8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_on__102b__GPU_on_Linux%2F0%2Fstdout First failure range: (468586, 468677) - 90 CLs First failed build: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Linux%20Perf/builds/625 Builders failed on: - Linux Perf: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Linux%20Perf - Mac 10.11 Perf: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Mac%2010.11%20Perf - Mac 10.12 Perf: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Mac%2010.12%20Perf - Mac Air 10.11 Perf: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Mac%20Air%2010.11%20Perf - Mac Pro 10.11 Perf: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Mac%20Pro%2010.11%20Perf - Mac Retina Perf: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Mac%20Retina%20Perf - Win Zenbook Perf: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Win%20Zenbook%20Perf
,
May 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980603562140756480
,
May 4 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: linux_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : API:count_avg/API:count_avg Revision Result N chromium@468586 247848 +- 16370.4 20 good To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980603562140756480 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5676094801313792 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 4 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980556498532567168
,
May 4 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: linux_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : API:count_avg/API:count_avg Revision Result N chromium@468586 245694 +- 14277.3 16 good To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980556498532567168 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5676094801313792 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 4 2017
Seems to be passing again as of https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Linux%20Perf/builds/631 https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Mac%2010.11%20Perf/builds/644 https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Mac%2010.12%20Perf/builds/440 https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Mac%20Air%2010.11%20Perf/builds/794 https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Mac%20Pro%2010.11%20Perf/builds/914 https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Mac%20Retina%20Perf/builds/616 https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Win%20Zenbook%20Perf/builds/547 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by ashleymarie@chromium.org
, May 3 2017