Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.7%-31.6% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 467538:467677 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980604425523333952
,
May 3 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : nednguyen Commit : c5cc2a4f4e1ae4dfd1459cba00e7d7a217bc1f70 Date : Thu Apr 27 11:25:47 2017 Subject: Support tracing metrics for measureTime & measureFrameTime methods in blink_perf (Reland) Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_mini_8gb_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : serialize-nested-array/serialize-nested-array Change : 36.74% | 0.270833333333 -> 0.370333333333 Revision Result N chromium@467596 0.270833 +- 0.0503074 6 good chromium@467634 0.2625 +- 0.0367355 6 good chromium@467636 0.266833 +- 0.0319818 6 good chromium@467637 0.367 +- 0.063498 6 bad <-- chromium@467639 0.350833 +- 0.0411684 6 bad chromium@467644 0.373833 +- 0.0577307 6 bad chromium@467653 0.364333 +- 0.031102 6 bad chromium@467671 0.370333 +- 0.0380438 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980604425523333952 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6715373807730688 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by mustaq@chromium.org
, May 3 2017