Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
7.7% regression in angle_perftests at 466631:466737 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980607612886031616
,
May 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980607606042819088
,
May 4 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author geofflang@chromium.org === Hi geofflang@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Geoff Lang Commit : 94ba36a77db9027b61c306a9718674251b7c9cb5 Date : Fri Apr 21 19:00:31 2017 Subject: Only bind that native GL texture if it should be complete. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : angle_perftests Metric : Textures_gl_8_textures_5_rebind_3_state_8_mips/score Change : 5.91% | 4429.16666667 -> 4167.5 Revision Result N chromium@466630 4429.17 +- 17.7998 6 good chromium@466657 4479.67 +- 90.3659 9 good chromium@466659 4372.78 +- 510.877 9 good chromium@466659,angle@f6b986c8fa 4321.33 +- 73.3439 6 good chromium@466659,angle@780612a546 4394.5 +- 16.8967 6 good chromium@466659,angle@94ba36a77d 4047.83 +- 70.1201 6 bad <-- chromium@466659,angle@e491578f31 4072.83 +- 84.0645 6 bad chromium@466660 4159.11 +- 33.1796 9 bad chromium@466661 4149.89 +- 111.557 9 bad chromium@466664 4107.17 +- 174.175 6 bad chromium@466671 4157.5 +- 44.8051 6 bad chromium@466684 4147.83 +- 28.1218 6 bad chromium@466737 4167.5 +- 14.543 6 bad To Run This Test .\src\out\Release_x64\angle_perftests.exe --test-launcher-print-test-stdio=always --test-launcher-jobs=1 Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980607612886031616 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5042591420121088 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 4 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Geoff Lang Commit : 94ba36a77db9027b61c306a9718674251b7c9cb5 Date : Fri Apr 21 19:00:31 2017 Subject: Only bind that native GL texture if it should be complete. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : angle_perftests Metric : Textures_gl_8_textures_5_rebind_3_state_8_mips/score Change : 5.76% | 4413.83333333 -> 4159.5 Revision Result N chromium@466630 4413.83 +- 44.9537 6 good chromium@466657 4464.33 +- 80.8538 6 good chromium@466659 4441.17 +- 61.1133 6 good chromium@466659,angle@f6b986c8fa 4332.83 +- 26.511 6 good chromium@466659,angle@780612a546 4401.33 +- 23.7346 6 good chromium@466659,angle@94ba36a77d 4081.83 +- 26.7737 6 bad <-- chromium@466659,angle@e491578f31 4080.5 +- 56.9693 6 bad chromium@466660 4146.0 +- 90.111 6 bad chromium@466661 4153.17 +- 63.9596 6 bad chromium@466664 4127.67 +- 121.299 6 bad chromium@466671 4161.83 +- 41.0711 6 bad chromium@466684 4144.17 +- 53.0738 6 bad chromium@466737 4159.5 +- 83.7108 6 bad To Run This Test .\src\out\Release_x64\angle_perftests.exe --test-launcher-print-test-stdio=always --test-launcher-jobs=1 Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980607606042819088 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5855222049538048 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 4 2017
This regression is expected, it was a correctness fix. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jmad...@chromium.org
, May 3 2017