New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 717565 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.4% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 467945:468051

Project Member Reported by ulan@google.com, May 2 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by ulan@google.com, May 2 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=717565

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgsvXl2QoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

linux-release

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed for unknown reasons

Please contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/load_media


Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980693000589856576

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6376897233027072


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed for unknown reasons

Please contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/load_media


Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980597996566977104

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6376897233027072


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 6 by u...@chromium.org, May 12 2017

Labels: Performance-Sheriff-V8
Project Member

Comment 7 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 18 2017

Labels: Hotlist-Google

Comment 8 by u...@chromium.org, Jul 24 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
The regressions come after improvement.

Sign in to add a comment