Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.9% regression in memory.top_10_mobile_stress at 468223:468226 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 1 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980775435593929088
,
May 2 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile_stress Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/background/after_http_yandex_ru_touchsearch_text_science Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980775435593929088 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4831884552437760 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 2 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980751595475977776
,
May 2 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : avayvod Commit : 77db41b769602da7ccc0106c285490f149fe343d Date : Sat Apr 29 04:09:14 2017 Subject: Remove the explicit dependency between HTMLMediaElement and MediaControls Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile_stress Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/background/after_http_yandex_ru_touchsearch_text_science Change : 3.72% | 105863597.333 -> 109805826.667 Revision Result N chromium@468222 105863597 +- 1087683 6 good chromium@468223 110859181 +- 760467 6 bad <-- chromium@468224 110274477 +- 1257963 6 bad chromium@468226 109805827 +- 1189333 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980751595475977776 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4831884552437760 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 3 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by nzolghadr@chromium.org
, May 1 2017