New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 717142 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Nov 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

176.4% regression in media.tough_video_cases at 467620:467677

Project Member Reported by w...@chromium.org, May 1 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by w...@chromium.org, May 1 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=717142

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgsuTnrQoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

win-high-dpi

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : energy_consumption_mwh/video.html?src_tulip2.m4a_type_audio

Revision             Result                 N
chromium@467619      14.1114 +- 16.306      21      good
chromium@467677      13.9885 +- 16.745      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.m4a.type.audio media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980775465928301504

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5286527980011520


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : energy_consumption_mwh/video.html?src_tulip2.m4a_type_audio

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@467619      12.816 +- 1.17479       21      good
chromium@467677      13.6913 +- 14.7312      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.m4a.type.audio media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980768833537339072

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5286527980011520


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Components: Internals>Media
Labels: Performance-Media
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
WontFix. Bisect didn't work and bug is stale.

Sign in to add a comment