New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 715952 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

15.1% regression in smoothness.top_25_smooth at 466587:466630

Project Member Reported by rmcilroy@chromium.org, Apr 27 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=715952

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg0qSs5AgM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-ati
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 27 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.top_25_smooth
  Metric       : frame_times/https___www.google.com_calendar_

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@466586      18.7577 +- 0.881873      21      good
chromium@466630      18.7758 +- 0.905083      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...www.google.com.calendar. smoothness.top_25_smooth

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981168696939352032

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6335051433771008


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 27 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.top_25_smooth
  Metric       : frame_times/https___www.google.com_calendar_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@466586      18.8298 +- 1.38356      21      good
chromium@466630      18.693 +- 1.10124       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...www.google.com.calendar. smoothness.top_25_smooth

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981155351279913456

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6335051433771008


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 28 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.top_25_smooth
  Metric       : frame_times/https___www.google.com_calendar_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@466586      18.7634 +- 0.96697      21      good
chromium@466630      18.8306 +- 2.61047      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...www.google.com.calendar. smoothness.top_25_smooth

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981056338337730272

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6335051433771008


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. 

Sign in to add a comment