Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
15.1% regression in smoothness.top_25_smooth at 466587:466630 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 27 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981168696939352032
,
Apr 27 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.top_25_smooth Metric : frame_times/https___www.google.com_calendar_ Revision Result N chromium@466586 18.7577 +- 0.881873 21 good chromium@466630 18.7758 +- 0.905083 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...www.google.com.calendar. smoothness.top_25_smooth Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981168696939352032 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6335051433771008 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 27 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981155351279913456
,
Apr 27 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.top_25_smooth Metric : frame_times/https___www.google.com_calendar_ Revision Result N chromium@466586 18.8298 +- 1.38356 21 good chromium@466630 18.693 +- 1.10124 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...www.google.com.calendar. smoothness.top_25_smooth Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981155351279913456 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6335051433771008 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 28 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981056338337730272
,
Apr 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.top_25_smooth Metric : frame_times/https___www.google.com_calendar_ Revision Result N chromium@466586 18.7634 +- 0.96697 21 good chromium@466630 18.8306 +- 2.61047 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...www.google.com.calendar. smoothness.top_25_smooth Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981056338337730272 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6335051433771008 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by rmcilroy@chromium.org
, Apr 27 2017