Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
52.3% improvement in startup.warm.blank_page at 463671:463870 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981207813044797280
,
Apr 27 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 137707cfcb43771e8a3d6805c3f327c22a4f87d9 bad_revision : 2040988b1345e6ce738bd03ab7ccd5f4b73a956b If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect Benchmark : startup.warm.blank_page Metric : open_tabs_time/open_tabs_time Change : 66.84% | 259.333333333 -> 86.0 Revision Result N chromium@463670 259.333 +- 23.6502 6 good chromium@463770 250.667 +- 5.03322 6 good chromium@463820 251.5 +- 12.47 6 good chromium@463833 254.167 +- 9.9415 6 good chromium@463839 248.5 +- 8.80341 6 good chromium@463842 251.833 +- 7.67029 6 good chromium@463845 85.6667 +- 3.3665 6 bad chromium@463870 86.0 +- 3.74166 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=2 --also-run-disabled-tests startup.warm.blank_page Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981207813044797280 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6741973412610048 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 27 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981201828712618832
,
Apr 27 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author samans@chromium.org === Hi samans@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : samans Commit : 2040988b1345e6ce738bd03ab7ccd5f4b73a956b Date : Tue Apr 11 23:58:35 2017 Subject: Use MojoCompositorFrameSink in RendererCompositorFrameSink Bisect Details Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect Benchmark : startup.warm.blank_page Metric : open_tabs_time/open_tabs_time Change : 66.56% | 255.166666667 -> 85.3333333333 Revision Result N chromium@463670 255.167 +- 13.6687 6 good chromium@463770 247.5 +- 5.24404 6 good chromium@463820 249.333 +- 9.2376 6 good chromium@463833 247.833 +- 16.5781 6 good chromium@463839 250.833 +- 6.54472 6 good chromium@463842 249.333 +- 14.1185 6 good chromium@463844 247.5 +- 7.44983 6 good chromium@463845 86.0 +- 5.09902 6 bad <-- chromium@463870 85.3333 +- 3.65148 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=2 --also-run-disabled-tests startup.warm.blank_page Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981201828712618832 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6741973412610048 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 29 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by samans@chromium.org
, Apr 26 2017