Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
68.1% improvement in startup.cold.blank_page at 463742:463938 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981215793290308272
,
Apr 26 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 51ce668aebf388516f2349a0b55bc622c14e3f4c bad_revision : db210de154551f5b47357592bab4612303b7a381 If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect Benchmark : startup.cold.blank_page Metric : open_tabs_time/open_tabs_time Change : 48.01% | 301.0 -> 156.5 Revision Result N chromium@463741 301.0 +- 51.4782 6 good chromium@463840 297.5 +- 49.371 6 good chromium@463844 303.5 +- 37.0338 6 good chromium@463846 155.667 +- 35.0904 6 bad chromium@463847 154.167 +- 42.1288 6 bad chromium@463853 150.667 +- 43.9014 6 bad chromium@463865 147.833 +- 41.7473 6 bad chromium@463889 149.333 +- 42.7005 6 bad chromium@463938 156.5 +- 44.0625 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests startup.cold.blank_page Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981215793290308272 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5278073672433664 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 27 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981206328490605024
,
Apr 27 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author samans@chromium.org === Hi samans@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : samans Commit : 2040988b1345e6ce738bd03ab7ccd5f4b73a956b Date : Tue Apr 11 23:58:35 2017 Subject: Use MojoCompositorFrameSink in RendererCompositorFrameSink Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect Benchmark : startup.cold.blank_page Metric : open_tabs_time/open_tabs_time Change : 55.43% | 319.0 -> 142.166666667 Revision Result N chromium@463741 319.0 +- 54.9545 6 good chromium@463840 315.833 +- 38.8694 6 good chromium@463844 303.167 +- 40.9492 6 good chromium@463845 141.5 +- 24.5255 6 bad <-- chromium@463846 148.167 +- 39.9354 6 bad chromium@463847 173.5 +- 34.8353 6 bad chromium@463853 157.0 +- 42.8019 6 bad chromium@463865 157.833 +- 48.3201 6 bad chromium@463889 155.333 +- 50.0733 6 bad chromium@463938 142.167 +- 46.8063 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests startup.cold.blank_page Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981206328490605024 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5278073672433664 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 29 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by samans@chromium.org
, Apr 26 2017