Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
213.7% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile at 466767:466806 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionNo interesting V8 change in this range at first glance.
,
Apr 25 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981332032018047008
,
Apr 26 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_sum/browse_news/browse_news_qq Revision Result N chromium@466766 10.7571 +- 20.5497 21 good chromium@466806 10.1556 +- 21.9942 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.qq v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981332032018047008 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5279865344884736 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981286034661879824
,
Apr 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981262483862730608
,
Apr 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981262475911375616
,
Apr 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981262464544488832
,
Apr 26 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : skobes Commit : 8a4d4531daca4b9a1f6dc1224bcb7134dc053ff4 Date : Mon Apr 24 19:19:10 2017 Subject: Temporarily ignore ScrollbarAnimationController::DidRequestShowFromMainThread. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : v8-gc-full-mark-compactor_avg/browse_news/browse_news_toi Change : 5.23% | 54.0771111111 -> 56.9045555556 Revision Result N chromium@466562 54.0771 +- 4.70193 9 good chromium@466679 54.5505 +- 5.7355 14 good chromium@466709 52.8611 +- 14.0744 14 good chromium@466711 53.8879 +- 7.09759 14 good chromium@466712 57.7755 +- 5.37046 6 bad <-- chromium@466713 57.4158 +- 6.68413 9 bad chromium@466717 56.3986 +- 8.23988 14 bad chromium@466724 56.261 +- 11.385 14 bad chromium@466738 56.662 +- 4.02482 9 bad chromium@466796 56.9046 +- 3.69436 9 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.toi v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981262475911375616 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5284835561570304 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 26 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : skobes Commit : 8a4d4531daca4b9a1f6dc1224bcb7134dc053ff4 Date : Mon Apr 24 19:19:10 2017 Subject: Temporarily ignore ScrollbarAnimationController::DidRequestShowFromMainThread. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : v8-gc-full-mark-compactor_sum/browse_news/browse_news_toi Change : 7.92% | 53.6152222222 -> 57.8608333333 Revision Result N chromium@466562 53.6152 +- 5.89069 9 good chromium@466679 54.1663 +- 3.2536 6 good chromium@466709 53.9026 +- 6.33768 14 good chromium@466711 53.5314 +- 5.05887 9 good chromium@466712 56.8427 +- 6.69323 9 bad <-- chromium@466713 56.2588 +- 11.0504 21 bad chromium@466717 56.4743 +- 12.1768 21 bad chromium@466724 56.5069 +- 6.93593 14 bad chromium@466738 57.4848 +- 4.33654 9 bad chromium@466796 57.8608 +- 3.56034 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.toi v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981262464544488832 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6378202701758464 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 26 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : skobes Commit : 8a4d4531daca4b9a1f6dc1224bcb7134dc053ff4 Date : Mon Apr 24 19:19:10 2017 Subject: Temporarily ignore ScrollbarAnimationController::DidRequestShowFromMainThread. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : v8-gc-full-mark-compactor_max/browse_news/browse_news_toi Change : 5.19% | 54.3618571429 -> 57.1812857143 Revision Result N chromium@466562 54.3619 +- 7.0469 14 good chromium@466679 54.2293 +- 5.50732 14 good chromium@466709 54.6769 +- 5.02696 14 good chromium@466711 54.2029 +- 7.25018 14 good chromium@466712 56.601 +- 11.1058 21 bad <-- chromium@466713 56.8051 +- 12.1116 21 bad chromium@466717 56.8949 +- 8.42204 14 bad chromium@466724 56.1324 +- 4.38333 9 bad chromium@466738 56.7026 +- 8.37919 14 bad chromium@466796 57.1813 +- 10.0626 14 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.toi v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981262483862730608 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6148623143796736 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_sum/browse_news/browse_news_qq Revision Result N chromium@466766 10.7571 +- 20.5497 21 good chromium@466806 10.1556 +- 21.9942 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.qq v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981286034661879824 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5279865344884736 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jgruber@chromium.org
, Apr 25 2017