Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.1%-2.9% regression in memory.top_10_mobile_stress at 466556:466559 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 25 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981387116823183040
,
Apr 25 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author dpranke@chromium.org === Hi dpranke@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : dpranke Commit : c1bc835e0ead2a64955b96ebde29ea191280f99e Date : Sun Apr 23 06:33:52 2017 Subject: Revert of [DevTools] Consolidate overlay-related functionality in Overlay domain (patchset #7 id:120001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2819183002/ ) Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile_stress Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/background/after_http_yandex_ru_touchsearch_text_science Change : 0.79% | 6236852.33333 -> 6286110.85714 Revision Result N chromium@466555 6236852 +- 141558 12 good chromium@466556 6227632 +- 116160 9 good chromium@466557 6285599 +- 3481.18 14 bad <-- chromium@466559 6286111 +- 3851.26 14 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981387116823183040 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6372376444403712 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 25 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981338064063970416
,
Apr 25 2017
I kicked off another bisect, Dirk's change seems within the noise
,
Apr 25 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : dpranke Commit : c1bc835e0ead2a64955b96ebde29ea191280f99e Date : Sun Apr 23 06:33:52 2017 Subject: Revert of [DevTools] Consolidate overlay-related functionality in Overlay domain (patchset #7 id:120001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2819183002/ ) Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile_stress Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/background/after_http_yandex_ru_touchsearch_text_science Change : 1.17% | 6212621.77778 -> 6285980.0 Revision Result N chromium@466555 6212622 +- 52580.4 9 good chromium@466556 6226718 +- 131820 9 good chromium@466557 6285364 +- 3256.51 9 bad <-- chromium@466559 6285980 +- 1360.81 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981338064063970416 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5837534367580160 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 25 2017
How do we deal w/ regressions that are caused by having to revert a change that broke things? WontFix them?
,
Apr 25 2017
WontFix but cc the original author. +dgozman FYI |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by rsch...@chromium.org
, Apr 25 2017