New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 714876 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
█ rsch...@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

13.9%-53.7% regression in page_cycler_v2.typical_25 at 466297:466387

Project Member Reported by rsch...@chromium.org, Apr 25 2017 
See the link to graphs below.
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 25 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.typical_25
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@466317      1461.33 +- 3349.72      21      good
chromium@466387      1416.49 +- 1489.49      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2.typical_25

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981387396853510432

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5783331343433728


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 25 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.typical_25
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@466317      1512.25 +- 3935.53      21      good
chromium@466387      1382.81 +- 987.854      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2.typical_25

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981376090815999872

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5783331343433728


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 25 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.typical_25
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@466317      1513.64 +- 3881.88      21      good
chromium@466387      1393.38 +- 992.067      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2.typical_25

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981325049221647232

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5524236367560704


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 25 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.typical_25
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@466305      1372.3 +- 4241.84       18      good
chromium@466362      1116.32 +- 839.157      20      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2.typical_25

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981325058782465888

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5017853180248064


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 25 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.typical_25
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@466317      1578.52 +- 3292.99      21      good
chromium@466387      1438.43 +- 895.803      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2.typical_25

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981314952524461792

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5524236367560704


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 13 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 25 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.typical_25
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@466305      1225.77 +- 3347.69      20      good
chromium@466362      1119.73 +- 764.256      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2.typical_25

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981315068626704960

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5017853180248064


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 26 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.typical_25
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@466305      1321.52 +- 4157.63      21      good
chromium@466362      1187.33 +- 1487.61      20      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2.typical_25

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981277779557182016

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5783331343433728


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 18 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 26 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.typical_25
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@466305      1184.71 +- 1745.21      18      good
chromium@466362      1248.68 +- 2422.4       20      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2.typical_25

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981214964468605072

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5017853180248064


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 19 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 26 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.typical_25
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@466305      1261.81 +- 3404.04      21      good
chromium@466362      1077.13 +- 595.174      19      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2.typical_25

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981214698370956192

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5524236367560704


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 21 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 3 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___farsnews.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@466287      528.736 +- 127.539      21      good
chromium@466372      538.145 +- 98.2121      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...farsnews.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980632551229443936

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5783331343433728


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 22 by benhenry@chromium.org, Jul 27 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.
►

Sign in to add a comment