New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 714872 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
█ rsch...@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

6.5%-107.1% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR at 465627:465860

Project Member Reported by rsch...@chromium.org, Apr 25 2017 
See the link to graphs below.
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 25 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.orange.fr_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@465666      70.789 +- 17.0187       21      good
chromium@465860      71.9543 +- 22.6288      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.orange.fr. page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981387521426456352

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5833811067142144


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 25 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.orange.fr_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@465666      70.2023 +- 18.3698      21      good
chromium@465860      69.9916 +- 20.5632      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.orange.fr. page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981376085632355536

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5833811067142144


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 25 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.masrawy.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@465626      1470.26 +- 158.985      21      good
chromium@465802      1466.4 +- 78.3554       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.masrawy.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981325092973036944

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6120101775933440


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 25 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___terra.es_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@465666      2437.11 +- 578.098      21      good
chromium@465860      2430.71 +- 515.041      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...terra.es. page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981325102259494592

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5100904962850816


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 25 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.masrawy.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@465626      1479.35 +- 127.567      21      good
chromium@465802      1486.86 +- 127.788      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.masrawy.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981314808181501840

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6120101775933440


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 13 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 25 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___terra.es_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@465666      2474.31 +- 660.803      21      good
chromium@465860      2493.88 +- 787.119      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...terra.es. page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981310912396585344

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5100904962850816


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 26 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.free.fr_adsl_index.html

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@465666      581.665 +- 209.421      21      good
chromium@465860      593.379 +- 190.37       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.free.fr.adsl.index.html page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981277775776971040

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5833811067142144


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 18 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 26 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.free.fr_adsl_index.html

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@465666      520.575 +- 142.621      21      good
chromium@465860      527.592 +- 96.3645      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.free.fr.adsl.index.html page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981214558179535216

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6120101775933440


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 19 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 27 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.free.fr_adsl_index.html

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@465666      539.351 +- 169.768      21      good
chromium@465860      534.309 +- 161.091      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.free.fr.adsl.index.html page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981210680047573648

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5100904962850816


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 21 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 3 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.free.fr_adsl_index.html

Revision             Result                 N
chromium@465666      524.69 +- 125.101      21      good
chromium@465860      532.74 +- 57.041       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.free.fr.adsl.index.html page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980628193203434480

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5833811067142144


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 22 by benhenry@chromium.org, Jul 27 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.
►

Sign in to add a comment