Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
9.3%-50.4% regression in system_health.common_desktop at 465524:465906 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981405112459733424
,
Apr 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_desktop Metric : css_animation:power_avg/browse_media/browse_media_tumblr Revision Result N chromium@465626 16.6901 +- 2.69829 21 good chromium@465802 16.561 +- 3.09126 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.tumblr system_health.common_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981405112459733424 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6721568022986752 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981392230280462368
,
Apr 24 2017
,
Apr 25 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_desktop Metric : css_animation:power_avg/browse_media/browse_media_tumblr Revision Result N chromium@465626 10.3835 +- 2.22223 21 good chromium@465802 10.0251 +- 2.43777 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.tumblr system_health.common_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981392230280462368 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6721568022986752 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 25 2017
Ref build moved on these.
,
Apr 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981289997090462352
,
Apr 26 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_desktop Metric : scroll_animation:power_avg/browse_news/browse_news_flipboard Revision Result N chromium@465626 15.9091 +- 0.819882 21 good chromium@465802 16.0402 +- 1.61464 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.flipboard system_health.common_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981289997090462352 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6721568022986752 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by rschoen@google.com
, Apr 24 2017