Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
12.9%-166.7% regression in v8.browsing_mobile at 466005:466184 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981420684666319968
,
Apr 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Metric : v8-gc-incremental-step_max/browse_shopping/browse_shopping_avito To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.shopping.avito v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981420684666319968 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6394909990322176 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981400252053602944
,
Apr 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Metric : v8-gc-incremental-step_max/browse_shopping/browse_shopping_avito Revision Result N chromium@466004 11.9488 +- 37.7003 21 good chromium@466184 12.9444 +- 32.3083 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.shopping.avito v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981400252053602944 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6394909990322176 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 25 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981298297028933136
,
Apr 26 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Metric : v8-gc-incremental-finalize_max/browse_media/browse_media_imgur Revision Result N chromium@466004 3.77524 +- 1.82894 21 good chromium@466184 3.836 +- 1.99797 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981298297028933136 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6394909990322176 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 26 2017
Looks like a recovered flake. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jgruber@chromium.org
, Apr 24 2017