Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3.2%-14765.9% regression in v8.browsing_mobile at 462584:465076 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSplitting off from issue 714351 ; these regressions are from _before_ the webview N5X bot broke.
,
Apr 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981421131372941952
,
Apr 24 2017
Only one regression remains here, and coincides to the moment when Battors were added to this bot (c.f. issue 710806 ). This caused a regression of about 18min seen here: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?sid=2daea37d7898b04952908e49cf9b51b0d99aa1a6f17d62d0b50c5681d00d9cd3&start_rev=462890&end_rev=464730 Not sure if there was already a bug about this?
,
Apr 24 2017
,
Apr 24 2017
The battor cycle time is tracked in issue 711277
,
Apr 25 2017
,
Apr 26 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_mobile Metric : benchmark_duration/benchmark_duration Revision Result N chromium@464022 0.246837 +- 0.0890542 21 good chromium@464059 0.247765 +- 0.12274 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.common_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981421131372941952 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5001693097361408 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981290269833755408
,
Apr 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_mobile Metric : benchmark_duration/benchmark_duration Revision Result N chromium@464022 0.246837 +- 0.0890542 21 good chromium@464059 0.247765 +- 0.12274 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.common_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981290269833755408 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5001693097361408 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 29 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981021940139055728
,
Apr 29 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_mobile Metric : benchmark_duration/benchmark_duration Revision Result N chromium@464022 0.243599 +- 0.0890272 21 good chromium@464059 0.242915 +- 0.112286 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.common_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981021940139055728 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5001693097361408 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jan 16
,
Jan 16
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by perezju@google.com
, Apr 24 2017