Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
23%-65.8% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic at 466005:466184 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue description
,
Apr 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981421183643442000
,
Apr 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Metric : v8-gc-incremental-step_sum/browse_shopping/browse_shopping_avito Revision Result N chromium@466004 901.749 +- 979.481 21 good chromium@466184 887.877 +- 890.159 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.shopping.avito v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981421183643442000 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6399210225664000 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981400249578562032
,
Apr 25 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Metric : v8-gc-incremental-step_sum/browse_shopping/browse_shopping_avito Revision Result N chromium@466004 893.1 +- 1051.25 21 good chromium@466184 925.262 +- 1095.33 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.shopping.avito v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981400249578562032 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6399210225664000 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 25 2017
Recovered at Point ID: 466833
,
Apr 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981294111545783536
,
Apr 26 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Metric : v8-gc-phantom-handle-callback_avg/browse_social/browse_social_twitter Revision Result N chromium@466004 0.0428902 +- 0.0146575 21 good chromium@466184 0.0429568 +- 0.0185027 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.twitter v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981294111545783536 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6399210225664000 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jgruber@chromium.org
, Apr 24 2017