Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
Benchmark runtime regressions due to new emerging market stories |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionThese are regressions in benchmark duration due to r465012, i.e. adding new EM stories.
,
Apr 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981422357878810080
,
Apr 24 2017
,
Apr 24 2017
,
Apr 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : benchmark_duration/benchmark_duration Revision Result N chromium@464949 0.0734808 +- 0.501301 21 good chromium@465047 0.0494825 +- 0.0318274 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=benchmark.duration v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981422357878810080 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5501467303084032 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981416710236988512
,
Apr 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : benchmark_duration/benchmark_duration Revision Result N chromium@464949 0.0499023 +- 0.0230821 21 good chromium@465047 0.0483717 +- 0.0204873 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=benchmark.duration v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981416710236988512 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5501467303084032 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 25 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981310786525659680
,
Apr 26 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : benchmark_duration/benchmark_duration Revision Result N chromium@464949 0.0499023 +- 0.0230821 21 good chromium@465047 0.0483717 +- 0.0204873 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981310786525659680 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5501467303084032 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jan 16
,
Jan 16
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by perezju@google.com
, Apr 24 2017