New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 714393 link

Starred by 0 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Apr 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3203% regression in media.mse_cases at 463838:463941

Project Member Reported by zhanliang@google.com, Apr 22 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 22 2017

Cc: capn@chromium.org
Owner: capn@chromium.org

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author capn@chromium.org ===

Hi capn@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the
results.


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : capn
  Commit : d85baf0b71c69bbd181aaefc8a803611e03c8eed
  Date   : Wed Apr 12 01:17:11 2017
  Subject: Enable SwiftShader fallback on desktop Linux.

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.mse_cases
  Metric       : mediasource_opening/AV_buffer_post_load
  Change       : 2.96% | 14.9596428571 -> 17.4066666667

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463837      14.9596 +- 70.8699      14      good
chromium@463863      9.51583 +- 8.02173      6       good
chromium@463870      9.84167 +- 7.25145      6       good
chromium@463871      9.29417 +- 8.87259      6       good
chromium@463872      17.4492 +- 7.30663      6       bad       <--
chromium@463873      17.7 +- 12.179          9       bad
chromium@463876      19.0833 +- 4.90984      6       bad
chromium@463889      16.9821 +- 10.3615      14      bad
chromium@463941      17.4067 +- 6.12116      9       bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.mse_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981591439910819936

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5355610079494144


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 22 2017

 Issue 714394  has been merged into this issue.

Comment 5 by capn@chromium.org, Apr 24 2017

Cc: zhanliang@google.com
Owner: ----
I don't think my CL caused this. The reported regression is 3203%, while my change adds less than 100% which is only barely outside of the normal variability range.

For the record, my CL enabled using WebGL without a (whitelisted) GPU, by performing 3D rendering on the CPU. As far as I know Media Source Extensions should not depend on WebGL. But there is an off chance that something triggers the creation of the GPU process, even though it's not available for anything other than WebGL. In that case this would be related to  Issue 702268 .
Cc: -zhanliang@google.com
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
The regression has disappeared since 4/22.

Sign in to add a comment