Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3203% regression in media.mse_cases at 463838:463941 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 22 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981591439910819936
,
Apr 22 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author capn@chromium.org === Hi capn@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : capn Commit : d85baf0b71c69bbd181aaefc8a803611e03c8eed Date : Wed Apr 12 01:17:11 2017 Subject: Enable SwiftShader fallback on desktop Linux. Bisect Details Configuration: linux_perf_bisect Benchmark : media.mse_cases Metric : mediasource_opening/AV_buffer_post_load Change : 2.96% | 14.9596428571 -> 17.4066666667 Revision Result N chromium@463837 14.9596 +- 70.8699 14 good chromium@463863 9.51583 +- 8.02173 6 good chromium@463870 9.84167 +- 7.25145 6 good chromium@463871 9.29417 +- 8.87259 6 good chromium@463872 17.4492 +- 7.30663 6 bad <-- chromium@463873 17.7 +- 12.179 9 bad chromium@463876 19.0833 +- 4.90984 6 bad chromium@463889 16.9821 +- 10.3615 14 bad chromium@463941 17.4067 +- 6.12116 9 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.mse_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981591439910819936 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5355610079494144 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 22 2017
Issue 714394 has been merged into this issue.
,
Apr 24 2017
I don't think my CL caused this. The reported regression is 3203%, while my change adds less than 100% which is only barely outside of the normal variability range. For the record, my CL enabled using WebGL without a (whitelisted) GPU, by performing 3D rendering on the CPU. As far as I know Media Source Extensions should not depend on WebGL. But there is an off chance that something triggers the creation of the GPU process, even though it's not available for anything other than WebGL. In that case this would be related to Issue 702268 .
,
Apr 27 2017
The regression has disappeared since 4/22. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by zhanliang@google.com
, Apr 22 2017