New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 714010 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: Fixed
Owner:
█ hpayer@chromium.org
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Apr 2017
Cc:
█ hpayer@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

130.1% regression in v8.browsing_desktop at 463130:463133

Project Member Reported by hpayer@google.com, Apr 21 2017 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by hpayer@google.com, Apr 21 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=714010

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDggsC3vAoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-dual
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 21 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-total_max/browse_media/browse_media_tumblr

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463129      13.1705 +- 18.4237      21      good
chromium@463133      13.1574 +- 14.3667      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.tumblr v8.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981726968863069616

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5854780305440768


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 21 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-total_max/browse_media/browse_media_tumblr

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463129      12.3553 +- 17.7468      21      good
chromium@463133      11.4629 +- 19.4583      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.tumblr v8.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981708888970915040

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5854780305440768


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 22 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-total_max/browse_media/browse_media_tumblr

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463129      12.3877 +- 11.7541      21      good
chromium@463133      13.9556 +- 29.5538      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.tumblr v8.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981606424954785520

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5854780305440768


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 8 by hpayer@chromium.org, Apr 24 2017

Status: Fixed (was: Assigned)
Recovered.
Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 29 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-total_max/browse_media/browse_media_tumblr

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463129      13.7784 +- 30.6741      21      good
chromium@463133      13.1338 +- 20.6297      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.tumblr v8.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980960291512884432

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5854780305440768


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
►

Sign in to add a comment