Issue 714009 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status:	Fixed
Owner:	█ hpayer@chromium.org Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed:	Jun 2017
Cc:	█ hpayer@chromium.org
EstimatedDays:	----
NextAction:	----
OS:	----
Pri:	2
Type:	Bug-Regression
M-60

Blocked on:
issue 715434

21.9% regression in v8.browsing_mobile at 465210:465372

Project Member Reported by hpayer@google.com, Apr 21 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by hpayer@google.com, Apr 21 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=714009

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgotLL4QsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgwoWc_gsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgwqf8rwsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-webview-nexus6

Project Member

Comment 2 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 21 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981726980729509520

Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 22 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : v8-gc-full-mark-compactor_max/browse_media/browse_media_imgur

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@465209      51.5278 +- 6.9844       21      good
chromium@465372      51.4332 +- 8.49435      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981726980729509520

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5836178533646336


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 22 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981634480255177952

Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 23 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : v8-gc-full-mark-compactor_max/browse_media/browse_media_imgur

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@465209      51.2971 +- 7.45051      21      good
chromium@465372      51.1424 +- 7.78258      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981634480255177952

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5836178533646336


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 24 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981442742109735040

Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 24 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981420699752451856

Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 25 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed for unknown reasons

Please contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_max/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_max


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981442742109735040

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5010947678142464


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 25 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981347899812435232

Comment 10 by hpayer@chromium.org, Apr 26 2017

Blockedon: 715434

Project Member

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 26 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_max/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_max

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@465209      51.2971 +- 7.45051      21      good
chromium@465372      51.1424 +- 7.78258      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981420699752451856

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5836178533646336


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 27 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed for unknown reasons

Please contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_max/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_max


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981347899812435232

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5010947678142464


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 13 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 28 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981099939601043168

Project Member

Comment 14 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 30 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed for unknown reasons

Please contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_max/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_max


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981099939601043168

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5010947678142464


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 3 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980628189700790464

Project Member

Comment 16 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 4 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@465209      51.2971 +- 7.45051      21      good
chromium@465372      51.1424 +- 7.78258      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980628189700790464

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5836178533646336


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 17 by hpayer@chromium.org, Jun 12 2017

Status: Fixed (was: Assigned)

Graphs recovered.

►

Issue 714009 link

Issue metadata

21.9% regression in v8.browsing_mobile at 465210:465372

Issue description

Comment 1 by hpayer@google.com, Apr 21 2017

Comment 1 Deleted

Comment 2 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 21 2017

Comment 2 Deleted

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 22 2017

Comment 3 Deleted

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 22 2017

Comment 4 Deleted

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 23 2017

Comment 5 Deleted

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 24 2017

Comment 6 Deleted

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 24 2017

Comment 7 Deleted

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 25 2017

Comment 8 Deleted

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 25 2017

Comment 9 Deleted

Comment 10 by hpayer@chromium.org, Apr 26 2017

Comment 10 Deleted

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 26 2017

Comment 11 Deleted

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 27 2017

Comment 12 Deleted

Comment 13 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 28 2017

Comment 13 Deleted

Comment 14 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 30 2017

Comment 14 Deleted

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 3 2017

Comment 15 Deleted

Comment 16 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 4 2017

Comment 16 Deleted

Comment 17 by hpayer@chromium.org, Jun 12 2017

Comment 17 Deleted

Sign in to add a comment