All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=713962

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgosHnogoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981745053473130512

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : vm_working_set_delta_size/video.html?src_tulip2.mp4_canvas_true

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463140      77098.3 +- 3551.41      21      good
chromium@463154      77194.1 +- 4623.85      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.mp4.canvas.true media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981745053473130512

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5816627842514944


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981739727929653776

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : vm_working_set_delta_size/video.html?src_tulip2.mp4_canvas_true

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463140      76959.4 +- 4863.41      21      good
chromium@463154      77094.1 +- 5081.93      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.mp4.canvas.true media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981739727929653776

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5816627842514944


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Bisecting wasn't able to find the regression. The "good" revision now has result similar to the current results, so this is likely an environmental issue.

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981642361133139200

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : vm_working_set_delta_size/video.html?src_tulip2.mp4_canvas_true

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463140      76959.4 +- 4863.41      21      good
chromium@463154      77094.1 +- 5081.93      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.mp4.canvas.true media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981642361133139200

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5816627842514944


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981004013634384192

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : vm_working_set_delta_size/video.html?src_tulip2.mp4_canvas_true

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463140      76931.4 +- 4187.24      21      good
chromium@463154      77258.9 +- 9032.08      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.mp4.canvas.true media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981004013634384192

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5816627842514944


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!