Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
56.6% improvement in system_health.common_desktop at 463683:463928 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 20 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981786742382995328
,
Apr 20 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_desktop Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/load_media/load_media_dailymotion To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.dailymotion system_health.common_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981786742382995328 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6172791495196672 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 20 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981785577070257920
,
Apr 20 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_desktop Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/load_media/load_media_dailymotion To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.dailymotion system_health.common_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981785577070257920 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6172791495196672 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 21 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981693357151613664
,
Apr 21 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_desktop Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/load_media/load_media_dailymotion To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.dailymotion system_health.common_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981693357151613664 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6172791495196672 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 28 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981056341472626304
,
Apr 28 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author samans@chromium.org === Hi samans@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : samans Commit : 2040988b1345e6ce738bd03ab7ccd5f4b73a956b Date : Tue Apr 11 23:58:35 2017 Subject: Use MojoCompositorFrameSink in RendererCompositorFrameSink Bisect Details Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_desktop Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/load_media/load_media_dailymotion Change : 56.12% | 444.8455 -> 195.181333333 Revision Result N chromium@463682 444.846 +- 13.6209 6 good chromium@463805 446.894 +- 20.1017 6 good chromium@463836 446.427 +- 14.4746 6 good chromium@463844 426.05 +- 169.417 9 good chromium@463845 207.992 +- 62.9668 6 bad <-- chromium@463846 206.446 +- 53.3016 6 bad chromium@463848 289.376 +- 459.785 14 bad chromium@463852 240.009 +- 200.364 9 bad chromium@463867 241.305 +- 226.137 9 bad chromium@463928 195.181 +- 14.0046 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.dailymotion system_health.common_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981056341472626304 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6172791495196672 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 29 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by samans@chromium.org
, Apr 20 2017