New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 713582 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Apr 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

157.8% regression in memory.top_10_mobile_stress at 464734:464777

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Apr 20 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=713582

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgoua7pgsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus7v2
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 20 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile_stress
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_www_google_co_uk_hl_en_q_science

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@464733      31853176 +- 1870812      21      good
chromium@464777      31802996 +- 1659364      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981811037879715312

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5055467362975744


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 21 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile_stress
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_www_google_co_uk_hl_en_q_science

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@464733      31953742 +- 2163696      21      good
chromium@464777      32054656 +- 2333904      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981758919056697184

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5055467362975744


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
I'm not convinced there's actually a regression here.
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 22 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile_stress
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_www_google_co_uk_hl_en_q_science

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@464733      30398865 +- 30040336      21      good
chromium@464777      31894016 +- 1962746       21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981654232072926224

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5055467362975744


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 30 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile_stress
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_www_google_co_uk_hl_en_q_science

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@464733      31847816 +- 1820527       21      good
chromium@464777      30588470 +- 30259747      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980956505635400880

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5055467362975744


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment