Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
157.8% regression in memory.top_10_mobile_stress at 464734:464777 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 20 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981811037879715312
,
Apr 20 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile_stress Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_www_google_co_uk_hl_en_q_science Revision Result N chromium@464733 31853176 +- 1870812 21 good chromium@464777 31802996 +- 1659364 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981811037879715312 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5055467362975744 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 20 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981758919056697184
,
Apr 21 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile_stress Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_www_google_co_uk_hl_en_q_science Revision Result N chromium@464733 31953742 +- 2163696 21 good chromium@464777 32054656 +- 2333904 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981758919056697184 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5055467362975744 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 21 2017
I'm not convinced there's actually a regression here.
,
Apr 22 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981654232072926224
,
Apr 22 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile_stress Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_www_google_co_uk_hl_en_q_science Revision Result N chromium@464733 30398865 +- 30040336 21 good chromium@464777 31894016 +- 1962746 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981654232072926224 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5055467362975744 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 29 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980956505635400880
,
Apr 30 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile_stress Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_www_google_co_uk_hl_en_q_science Revision Result N chromium@464733 31847816 +- 1820527 21 good chromium@464777 30588470 +- 30259747 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980956505635400880 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5055467362975744 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org
, Apr 20 2017