New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 713579 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner:
█ glebl@chromium.org
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: May 2017
Cc:
█ alexclarke@chromium.org
█ glebl@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3.1%-22.7% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 465000:465089

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Apr 20 2017 
See the link to graphs below.
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 20 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_news/load_news_bbc

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@464999      12124843 +- 4323587      21      good
chromium@465089      12671707 +- 4003659      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.bbc system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981811077993218032

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4984841994502144


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 20 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_news/load_news_bbc

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@464999      12259474 +- 3847274      21      good
chromium@465089      12703890 +- 3998690      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.bbc system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981804850298242496

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4984841994502144


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 21 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_news/load_news_qq

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@464999      8768951 +- 2571842      21      good
chromium@465089      9056061 +- 2997179      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.qq system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981708967153659440

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4984841994502144


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 29 2017

Cc: glebl@chromium.org
Owner: glebl@chromium.org

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author glebl@chromium.org ===

Hi glebl@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the
results.


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : glebl
  Commit : 32b03d0d86b7fc377a92f11b0ec7d61489ef4b4e
  Date   : Mon Apr 17 20:28:27 2017
  Subject: Import css21/floats-clear W3C CSS Test Suite

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_media/load_media_dailymotion
  Change       : 6.30% | 9528490.66667 -> 10128725.3333

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@464999      9528491 +- 214349       6      good
chromium@465000      12205397 +- 162488      6      bad       <--
chromium@465001      12011861 +- 135839      6      bad
chromium@465002      11878059 +- 267665      6      bad
chromium@465005      11564373 +- 362807      6      bad
chromium@465011      11241131 +- 428533      6      bad
chromium@465022      10832555 +- 400062      6      bad
chromium@465044      10410667 +- 289405      6      bad
chromium@465089      10128725 +- 206278      6      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.dailymotion system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981070067652567856

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4984841994502144


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 10 by glebl@chromium.org, May 9 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
crrev.com/465000 imports css21/floats-clear from the upstream web-platform-tests repository. I think it's expected that importing/running more tests slow down the performance bot.
►

Sign in to add a comment