Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4.6%-25.7% regression in smoothness.tough_filters_cases at 465175:465372 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 20 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981811090687641248
,
Apr 21 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.tough_filters_cases Metric : frame_times/http___web.archive.org_web_20150502135732_http___ie.microsoft.com_testdrive_Performance_Pirates_Default.html To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...web.archive.org.web.20150502135732.http...ie.microsoft.com.testdrive.Performance.Pirates.Default.html smoothness.tough_filters_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981811090687641248 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5870665778855936 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 21 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981689390205862064
,
Apr 23 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.tough_filters_cases Metric : frame_times/http___web.archive.org_web_20150502135732_http___ie.microsoft.com_testdrive_Performance_Pirates_Default.html To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...web.archive.org.web.20150502135732.http...ie.microsoft.com.testdrive.Performance.Pirates.Default.html smoothness.tough_filters_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981689390205862064 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5870665778855936 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981436775271550672
,
Apr 25 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.tough_filters_cases Metric : frame_times/http___web.archive.org_web_20150502135732_http___ie.microsoft.com_testdrive_Performance_Pirates_Default.html To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...web.archive.org.web.20150502135732.http...ie.microsoft.com.testdrive.Performance.Pirates.Default.html smoothness.tough_filters_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981436775271550672 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5870665778855936 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 2 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980663203225030528
,
May 3 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : hidehiko Commit : ddefb10bee663f8d240c999309f37cc2f96d2e92 Date : Tue Apr 18 11:14:53 2017 Subject: Revert of Back PaintRecord with PaintOpBuffer instead of SkPicture (patchset #42 id:810001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2768143002/ ) Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases Metric : frame_times/https___testdrive-archive.azurewebsites.net_performance_chalkboard_ Change : 4.53% | 37.1176087117 -> 38.7984850002 Revision Result N chromium@465174 37.1176 +- 0.822244 6 good chromium@465186 37.3626 +- 0.746387 6 good chromium@465192 37.0735 +- 1.24226 6 good chromium@465195 36.5675 +- 0.743261 6 good chromium@465196 38.8188 +- 0.551929 6 bad <-- chromium@465197 38.8625 +- 0.617253 6 bad chromium@465198 38.8387 +- 0.581037 6 bad chromium@465221 38.7985 +- 0.800084 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...testdrive.archive.azurewebsites.net.performance.chalkboard. smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980663203225030528 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5870665778855936 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org
, Apr 20 2017