New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 713572 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

4.3%-8.8% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 462279:465480

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Apr 20 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=713572

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgosiZ_AoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgov2a8wgM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-webview-nexus6
Project Member

Comment 2 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 21 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_google

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@465372      4907214 +- 1162825      21      good
chromium@465400      4981817 +- 1018899      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.google system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981811195387947584

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6161359902867456


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 23 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_google

Revision             Result                 N
chromium@465372      5032073 +- 836244      21      good
chromium@465400      5006572 +- 940963      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.google system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981689388352549216

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6161359902867456


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 25 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_google

Revision             Result                 N
chromium@465372      5032073 +- 836244      21      good
chromium@465400      5006572 +- 940963      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.google system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981432660930002896

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6161359902867456


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/browse_social/browse_social_twitter

Revision             Result                 N
chromium@465372      5032073 +- 836244      21      good
chromium@465400      5006572 +- 940963      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.twitter system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980663185852829600

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6161359902867456


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. 

Sign in to add a comment