New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 713115 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Apr 2017
Cc:
█ alexclarke@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

125.6%-234.5% regression in media.android.tough_video_cases_tbmv2 at 463124:463137

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Apr 19 2017 
See the link to graphs below.
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.android.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : story:power_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.webm

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@463123      1.70872 +- 0.14253       21      good
chromium@463137      1.71496 +- 0.132464      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.webm media.android.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981888042731942320

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5861368583946240


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.android.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : story:power_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.webm

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@463123      1.70872 +- 0.14253       21      good
chromium@463137      1.71496 +- 0.132464      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.webm media.android.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981872983184978128

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5861368583946240


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 20 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.android.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : story:power_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.mp4

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@463123      2.17438 +- 0.350452      21      good
chromium@463137      2.17507 +- 0.453746      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.mp4 media.android.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981774138708327552

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5861368583946240


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 8 by alexclarke@chromium.org, Apr 21 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
The ref moved at the same time.  We can close this.
Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 28 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.android.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : story:power_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.webm

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@463123      1.73414 +- 0.129848      21      good
chromium@463137      1.73143 +- 0.115085      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.webm media.android.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981129703530560592

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5861368583946240


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
►

Sign in to add a comment