New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 713110 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

8.1% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 464695:464709

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Apr 19 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=713110

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgouCQpgoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/http_m_youtube_com_results_q_science

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@464694      74830799 +- 25474671      21      good
chromium@464709      74104442 +- 21384644      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981888110773309424

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6341734302220288


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 20 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/http_m_youtube_com_results_q_science

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@464694      76334616 +- 31046783      21      good
chromium@464709      74850499 +- 25532132      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981857882478298912

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6341734302220288


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 21 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/http_m_youtube_com_results_q_science

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@464694      74107173 +- 21362658      21      good
chromium@464709      74853425 +- 25480782      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981720480737124128

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6341734302220288


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 29 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/http_m_youtube_com_results_q_science

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@464694      74082792 +- 21402638      21      good
chromium@464709      74834895 +- 25438069      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981043204978704064

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6341734302220288


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. 

Sign in to add a comment