New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 713105 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Owner:
Closed: Apr 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

11.4% regression in blink_perf.paint at 464413:464559

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Apr 19 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=713105

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgwrDfvgoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac12
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017

Cc: enne@chromium.org
Owner: enne@chromium.org

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author enne@chromium.org ===

Hi enne@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the
results.


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : enne
  Commit : 09670a9d1f03c414f8b7bb67c4bd27ccf46a84e1
  Date   : Thu Apr 13 21:44:55 2017
  Subject: Back PaintRecord with PaintOpBuffer instead of SkPicture

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.paint
  Metric       : paint-offset-changes/paint-offset-changes
  Change       : 6.32% | 144.295178571 -> 153.4105

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@464412      144.295 +- 47.4651      14      good
chromium@464486      138.675 +- 3.88389      6       good
chromium@464523      139.049 +- 5.41509      6       good
chromium@464541      138.48 +- 2.96887       6       good
chromium@464550      137.685 +- 3.041        6       good
chromium@464553      138.096 +- 3.09966      6       good
chromium@464554      138.544 +- 2.31814      6       good
chromium@464555      154.174 +- 8.56169      6       bad       <--
chromium@464559      153.411 +- 6.20525      9       bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.paint

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981888212321648176

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6440648003026944


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 4 by enne@chromium.org, Apr 21 2017

Mergedinto: 712455
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

Sign in to add a comment