Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
11.4% regression in blink_perf.paint at 464413:464559 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981888212321648176
,
Apr 19 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author enne@chromium.org === Hi enne@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : enne Commit : 09670a9d1f03c414f8b7bb67c4bd27ccf46a84e1 Date : Thu Apr 13 21:44:55 2017 Subject: Back PaintRecord with PaintOpBuffer instead of SkPicture Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.paint Metric : paint-offset-changes/paint-offset-changes Change : 6.32% | 144.295178571 -> 153.4105 Revision Result N chromium@464412 144.295 +- 47.4651 14 good chromium@464486 138.675 +- 3.88389 6 good chromium@464523 139.049 +- 5.41509 6 good chromium@464541 138.48 +- 2.96887 6 good chromium@464550 137.685 +- 3.041 6 good chromium@464553 138.096 +- 3.09966 6 good chromium@464554 138.544 +- 2.31814 6 good chromium@464555 154.174 +- 8.56169 6 bad <-- chromium@464559 153.411 +- 6.20525 9 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.paint Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981888212321648176 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6440648003026944 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 21 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org
, Apr 19 2017