Issue 713091 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status:	WontFix
Owner:	----
Closed:	Jul 2017
Cc:	█ alexclarke@chromium.org
EstimatedDays:	----
NextAction:	----
OS:	----
Pri:	2
Type:	Bug-Regression
Performance-Sheriff M-59

9.5%-12.7% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi at 463346:464705

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Apr 19 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org, Apr 19 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=713091

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDggoP1lAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDggpnc_wkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgwp6ougsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgovDX5ggM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDggufSnwsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDggqrB6QgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDggtjLtQkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac-retina
chromium-rel-mac11
chromium-rel-mac11-air
chromium-rel-mac11-pro
chromium-rel-win10

Project Member

Comment 2 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981888428435781568

Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.chosun.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463350      156.268 +- 5.55348      21      good
chromium@463497      157.243 +- 4.58786      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.chosun.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981888428435781568

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4579663571058688


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981880598699264704

Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.chosun.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463350      156.31 +- 8.1803        21      good
chromium@463497      156.197 +- 17.6982      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.chosun.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981880598699264704

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4579663571058688


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981843401426048384

Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 20 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981781785669847600

Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 20 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.chosun.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463350      156.768 +- 11.7957      21      good
chromium@463497      157.548 +- 26.7062      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.chosun.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981781785669847600

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4579663571058688


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 20 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Please try rerunning the bisect.


If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.chosun.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463448      1424.31 +- 2743.14      14      good
chromium@464703      1573.22 +- 2857.91      14      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.chosun.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981843401426048384

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5003841252098048


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 20 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981751245807318128

Project Member

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 21 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Please try rerunning the bisect.


If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.chosun.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463448      1330.36 +- 1747.65      14      good
chromium@464703      1764.91 +- 4335.06      14      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.chosun.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981751245807318128

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5003841252098048


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 23 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981566591047766512

Project Member

Comment 13 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 23 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.chosun.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463350      157.016 +- 9.29539      21      good
chromium@463497      156.851 +- 12.4002      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.chosun.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981566591047766512

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5003841252098048


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 14 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 27 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981138708824561056

Project Member

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 29 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Please try rerunning the bisect.


If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.chosun.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463382      125.607 +- 5.37926      14      good
chromium@464704      141.621 +- 42.206       14      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.chosun.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981138708824561056

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4579663571058688


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 16 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 30 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980926742671157360

Project Member

Comment 17 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 1 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Please try rerunning the bisect.


If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.chosun.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463382      125.073 +- 7.88374      14      good
chromium@464704      141.843 +- 45.1898      14      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.chosun.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980926742671157360

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5003841252098048


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 18 by benhenry@chromium.org, Jul 27 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)

This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.

►

Issue 713091 link

Issue metadata

9.5%-12.7% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi at 463346:464705

Issue description

Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org, Apr 19 2017

Comment 1 Deleted

Comment 2 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017

Comment 2 Deleted

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017

Comment 3 Deleted

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017

Comment 4 Deleted

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017

Comment 5 Deleted

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017

Comment 6 Deleted

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 20 2017

Comment 7 Deleted

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 20 2017

Comment 8 Deleted

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 20 2017

Comment 9 Deleted

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 20 2017

Comment 10 Deleted

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 21 2017

Comment 11 Deleted

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 23 2017

Comment 12 Deleted

Comment 13 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 23 2017

Comment 13 Deleted

Comment 14 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 27 2017

Comment 14 Deleted

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 29 2017

Comment 15 Deleted

Comment 16 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 30 2017

Comment 16 Deleted

Comment 17 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 1 2017

Comment 17 Deleted

Comment 18 by benhenry@chromium.org, Jul 27 2017

Comment 18 Deleted

Sign in to add a comment