Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10%-13.8% regression in blink_perf.paint at 464603:464709 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981888482593565728
,
Apr 19 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : enne Commit : e594588348ea08e4cdc15dc587efa5645db5023e Date : Fri Apr 14 07:42:34 2017 Subject: Back PaintRecord with PaintOpBuffer instead of SkPicture Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.paint Metric : paint-offset-changes/paint-offset-changes Change : 8.48% | 2062.24191667 -> 2237.05016667 Revision Result N chromium@464694 2062.24 +- 37.1169 6 good chromium@464698 2005.5 +- 21.6379 6 good chromium@464700 2002.27 +- 24.8292 6 good chromium@464701 2277.27 +- 81.314 6 bad <-- chromium@464702 2299.51 +- 49.3305 6 bad chromium@464709 2237.05 +- 28.4276 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.paint Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981888482593565728 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5908271438757888 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org
, Apr 19 2017